Monday, November 13, 2006

More than a little nervous to write about this

You know, I have a lot of opinions about a lot of different things. Sometimes, my opinions on different things frustrate people......heck, my own opinions frustrate me every once in a while. But for a while now, I have written or talked about a number of things that I am passionate about or am interested in. However, there has been one thing I have avoided writing or talking about completely because of the sensitivity of the issue and all of the negative directions it can turn when it is discussed.

My opinions on this particular subject started more than a year ago as my wife and I were sitting in Johnny Tamales eating enchiladas and enjoying some good conversation. We were talking about how a lot of different states had recently been involved in the same-sex marriage debate and what individual states were doing with their own marriage laws. Inevitably, the discussion came to what the "typical" evangelical or Religious Right response is on the issue, which is to do everything they can to ban the same-sex union and keep marriage sacred (no commentary here on how Christians have some of the highest divorce rates in the country). What struck me that night was not what states are or are not trying to pass this legislature or what Christians' responses usually are to this, but rather something else. I found myself thinking: "Is allowing or banning same-sex marriage what really matters in that whole debate?"

And I decided it's not. In my opinion, here is why:

How have we as Christians been labeled in this whole debate by the media, by critics, and by the homosexual population? As a group of fundamentalists that hate gays and wish they did not exist, that's how. And that's just wrong; dead wrong.

There are plenty of examples floating around out there that fuel the fire to this theory. Check out this article which quotes the Prime Minister of the Caribbean country of Dominica as he speaks out against gay cruises coming to his country and how he does not want them coming "to the island to conduct themselves in any immoral way."

Or what about the members of the Westboro Baptist Church in Kansas protesting at a fallen soldier's funeral because they believe God is punishing this country for its tolerance of homosexuality.

Maybe it's just me, but I don't see Jesus as a man who would stand in picket lines condemning homosexuals. But again, maybe it's just me.

Or what about countless churches who refuse to let homosexuals "place membership." Sorry, you can't be on our role because of your sins and lifestyle. Maybe they should kick out the liars, the gossipers and the greedy, too. Oh, wait a minute.....we can hide those sins, so never mind.

It gets to be so rampant and so anti-Christ that you have celebrities like Elton John saying that we should ban religion because it "promotes hatred and spite against gays." It's not that his opinion that religous people hate gays that bothers me. That view is so overstated, worn out and uninteresting anyway. It's the word "promote" that gets me; that he thinks Christians make it a point to push an agenda of hate onto others.

We have too quickly become anti-gay, anti-same-sex marriage, anti-equality. We are anti-so many things these days, that I have started to wonder; what are we FOR?

Well, I will tell you what I am for. I am for anyone who accepts homosexuals as a fellow son or daughter of God. I am for anyone who believes this hate and injustice should stop immediately. I am for anyone who is friends with homosexuals and treats them like Jesus would. I am for anyone who remembers that Jesus, more often than not, would rather be at the houses of the "sinners" than with the religious elite of His time.

If you are one of those who believes we should hate homosexuals and we should do what we can to make life for them miserable, then please come find me. I will debate you until I am blue in the face for the other side. Remember, there is a HUGE difference between hating homosexuality and hating homosexuals.

We've all talked a lot lately about changing hearts, and not just behavior or actions. Our response too often to the debate has been "you need to stop being gay because it is wrong and you are wrong," when it should be, "Jesus loves you endlessly and completely. You and I are exactly alike in that we will always fall short of what He wants. But as best as I can, I will love you endlessly and completely, too."

What a different world it would be if we were perceived like that. What a difference it would make if celebrities in interviews said something like, "everyone could learn a thing or two from Christians because they love and care about the weak and the sick, the unlovely and the unlovable, the unappreciated and the underrepresented."

Hate is ugly, it is pathetic, and it is wrong. We as Christians should have no part of it. So who cares if the agenda being pushed is whether or not to allow gay marriage? It's irrelevant. Let's think above that issue and more about the person, the individual with a soul, the child of God. It's a much better way to live.

-Ryan

7 comments:

Jared said...

I could not agree with you more. I would like to broaden your idea under the general idea that evangelical conservatives have somehow adopted the notion of withdrawl and disengagement as standard of practice. As an evangelical and a conservative, I am not throwing stones at other people, I am looking at myself and the people I am "in community" with. Look at the list of subjects we've chosen to disengage from: abortion, homosexuality, science, poverty, justice, the environment, end of life issues, beginning of life issues, etc. etc. Ironically, rather than a monastic withdrawal from these societal issues, our disengagement has taken the form of a blanket condemnation, oftentimes without fully understanding the issue, and more importantly understanding the people behind the issues. It is easy to say stem cell research is wrong without knowing the difference between synthetic embryonic stem cells, cord cells, and adult stem cells. It is easy to say that evolution and its proponents are wrong and to propose intelligent design, without understanding the issues and notion of what is a scientific theory. It is easy to say "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" when you've never had to. I am as guilty as anyone else at engaging in this sort of knee jerk polictical banter, and I do not claim to have all the answers. What I am learning every day is that Jesus very rarely disengaged from sinful people, difficult situations, and social hot button issues. What gives us the right to do the same. Our engagement should be marked by love and compassion, along with critical thinking and committment to our standards. Having one without the other is a shame, and one that I am ashamed of having in my own life.

Bart said...

Ryan – All the things you are ‘for’ I agree with you. I also am for courageous people like you who stand up and say what they believe, whether popular or unpopular.

I would add only one thing…I am for calling someone by his or her name, instead of a name.

Anonymous said...

Great post Ryan. Now you're preaching! I stand with you.

-David Cady

Andy said...

I do agree with many of the points you make, such as treating this population with dignity and love, rather than hate and malice. I also agree that it is important to reach out to homosexuals, treating them as Jesus would have treated them. I even agree that banning same-sex marriages is not what really matters; it is reaching out to individuals in Christian love.

However, I must say that I strongly diverge when you said, “Or what about countless churches who refuse to let homosexuals "place membership." Sorry, you can't be on our role because of your sins and lifestyle. Maybe they should kick out the liars, the gossipers and the greedy, too. Oh, wait a minute.....we can hide those sins, so never mind.” I honestly think that individuals who are engaging in a homosexual lifestyle should not be allowed to place membership at a church that believes this to be a sin. I know that we are all sinners here, probably sinning daily, but I would hope that we are trying our very best to live a good life, free of sin, striving to be like Christ. In general, homosexuals either believe that their lifestyle is not a sin or have no plans to change. It would be very different if a homosexual wanted to place membership while expressing a desire to stop sinning and follow Christ. I would hope we could hold any individual blatantly living a life of sin to the same standards, no matter what sin they refuse to give up. This is not to say that they should be banned from the building or church activities. After enough study and fellowship, that may express a desire to change and begin the process to achieve this. ( I know the argument could be raised,”What about a current member, for example, who commits adultery again and again without remorse or reproach?” I do believe it may come to a point in which we should “disfellowship” and ask the member to leave.).

I just feel that church membership is for believers trying their best to follow Christ, the Church, and the Bible’s teachings. We want the rest of the word to know our moral standards and values and allowing just anyone to place membership is sending the wrong message to the community about what we stand for at our congregation as Christians.

-Andy

Anonymous said...

Brilliant phrase and it is duly [url=http://cgi2.ebay.fr/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPage&userid=acheter_levitra_ici_1euro&achat-levitra]acheter levitra generique[/url] In my opinion you commit an error. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM.

Anonymous said...

Today it's rather particular to safe keeping divergent medical companies Best Discount Viagra Pharmacy On-line, outstandingly those who the moment their meds online.

Anonymous said...

Quelle phrase magnifique cialis sur le net cialis [url=http://www.ci2s.org]acheter cialis[/url]